saves saves saves 
Friends, of course we, the democrats against dictatorships and their creators, of course, Gaddafi is a dictator his people, and like all dictators is maintained by daily exercise of violence against it.
Does that entitles us to intervene in any country suffering to overthrow a dictatorship? Are they for why the United Nations? Why theocratic feudal monarchies of Arabia or the Persian Gulf are to get rid of the "timely" military intervention of the great "gendarme" global democracy and its allies that lay down and allow access to the citizenship status of the subjects and slaves until now?
How great are the imperialist hypocrites! How to play with the world and make their interests prevail!. The United Nations is their hostage, maintained and persist because they care and are home to countries where human rights do not even apply, or defend, or "know" of its existence, let alone have them as potential targets. This we all know. How ironic that these countries, many satellites and other dependents of the great global master, voted the resolution to dictate American!
Not quite six months that Gaddafi was received within the "establishment" as the son repented of her past "terrorist" as the new and necessary partner, as the taxpayer with its oil wells to the support of the mad rush developmental and wild Western world without limits. It was embraced and feted by statesmen such as Obama, Blair, Sarkozy, Berlusconi and of course, would not be less, "our" great Zapatero. Million dollar contracts were signed with the Libyan tyrant, while both were provided with weapons and training to tribal opponents if the case was reached.
The world is sometimes incredible speeds, although the shift intend Rubalcaba speed limit. And there was a wave (it is possible that interested and organized from elsewhere) democratization in North Africa and dropped the 'socialist' Ali Mubarak of Egypt and Tunisia. Why Gaddafi would deliver the "ex-terrorist" and ex-enemy of the West? The occasion was made eggs.
tribes who had received weapons and logistical support if necessary, were ordered to "democratize" Libya. The debt should be paid to win the delivery of energy resources to countries willing rescuers who provided generous and the powder would fall to the dictator of that work could do without. But what dictator resists and takes no violence to the extent necessary to stay? They failed
calculations Americans and French, the dictator was stronger and had more support than they had infiltrated agents believe. Nothing, that's what the United Nations ... the rest is a cruel global war where missiles and bombs are killing more Libyan dictatorship itself produced in their fight against opponents.
I, we, against dictatorships, I, we, against the dictator, to resolve this conflict is the task of the Libyan people without outside interference. Other people have had fratricidal struggles throughout history, the U.S., the English-Scottish-Irish the French ... and until we had our uncivil war that no democratic government without outside moviese a finger for the English people. Sure, we had no oil, no uranium, or gold or diamonds ... just a culture in its best and a wild desire for freedom.
Friends, that every people resolve their issues, and pain that we feel, for themselves. External interventions bring only more death, more destruction, more pain ... but yes, they serve to place in the "market" and emptied his deadly military-industrial production. What the United Nations work for peace and not war, that was the idea that we sold, another one practice the dictates of the powerful.
I am against Gaddafi, but also against Idris of turn, but especially against unscrupulous thieves wealth of other peoples.
How wise those who said "if you want peace prepare for war no", so I'm, we're against the military, the armies against the enemies of peace among the peoples against imperialism and neocolonizers, are Yankees, French o. .. English.
